Size-brightness correspondence: Crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning
Peter Walker, Laura Walker

Date: 2012-06-20 09:00 AM – 10:45 AM
Last modified: 2012-05-06

Abstract


Using a speeded classification task, Walker and Walker (2012) demonstrated a cross-sensory correspondence between haptic size and surface brightness. Specifically, adult participants classified bright (dark) visual stimuli more quickly and accurately when this required them to press the smaller (bigger) of two response keys which were always hidden from view. The nature of the correspondence (i.e., small being aligned with bright), along with various aspects of the task situation, indicated that the congruity effect originated at later stages of information processing concerned with the semantic classification of stimuli and response selection. The study reported here provides additional evidence for the involvement of semantic coding. When the names of bright (white) edible substances (e.g., flour) and dark (black) inedible substances (e.g., soot) were classified according to their surface brightness, the same size-brightness congruity effect was observed. However, when the basis for classification of the substances was switched to their edibility, the congruity effect disappeared. It is therefore proposed that congruity effects based on cross-sensory correspondences can reflect interactions between the connotative meanings of elementary stimulus features (cf. Karwoski, Odbert, & Osgood, 1942).

References


Karwoski, T. F., Odbert, H. S., & Osgood, C. E. (1942). Studies in synesthetic thinking: II. The role of form in visual responses to music. The Journal of General Psychology, 26, 199-222. Walker, P. & Walker, L. (2012). Size-brightness correspondence: Crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. DOI 10.3758/s13414-012-0297-9

Conference System by Open Conference Systems & MohSho Interactive